Why I support Trump

 

For a traditional, or conservative Republican (ME), Donald Trump’s presidency and political platform delivered major policy wins that aligned closely with long-held party goals.

20 key aspects of Donald Trump and his policies that I approve of include:

1. Transformational Judicial Appointments

For decades, conservative Republicans made reshaping the federal judiciary a top priority. Trump delivered by appointing hundreds of federal judges, including three conservative Supreme Court Justices (Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett). This solidified a conservative majority that led to landmark decisions, most notably the overturning of Roe v. Wade, returning abortion regulations to the states.

2. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

Passed in late 2017, this was the most sweeping overhaul of the U.S. tax code in decades. Republicans praised it for significantly lowering the corporate tax rate (from 35% to 21%), doubling the standard deduction, and cutting individual income tax brackets. Supporters credit the law with fueling pre-pandemic economic growth and boosting business investment.

3. Aggressive Federal Deregulation

True to conservative small-government principles, the Trump administration made deregulation a hallmark of its agenda. For every new federal regulation introduced, the administration aimed to cut multiple existing ones, particularly targeting bureaucratic red tape in environmental oversight, financial services, and labor that they argued stifled business growth and job creation.

4. Energy Independence and Fossil Fuel Production

Embracing the "drill, baby, drill" philosophy, Trump rolled back restrictions on oil and gas leasing on public lands, approved major pipeline projects (like the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines), and withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord. These moves helped the U.S. achieve net energy independence for the first time in decades, lowering energy costs for consumers and manufacturers.

5. Strict Border Security and Hardline Immigration Enforcement

Immigration is a cornerstone issue for the Republican base. Republicans strongly support Trump’s focus on building a southern border wall, enforcing stricter asylum restrictions (such as the "Remain in Mexico" policy), and increasing funding and powers for ICE and Border Patrol to curb illegal immigration.

6. "America First" Trade Policies and Tariffs

Breaking away from decades of bipartisan consensus on free trade, Trump utilized aggressive tariffs—most notably against China—to protect domestic manufacturing industries. He also renegotiated NAFTA, replacing it with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which Republicans championed for securing stricter labor and manufacturing requirements for American workers.

7. Historic Middle East Diplomacy (The Abraham Accords)

In foreign policy, conservatives lauded the administration's unconventional approach, particularly in the Middle East. This included moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, withdrawing from the Iran Nuclear Deal, and brokering the Abraham Accords—normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab nations such as the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain.

8. The First Step Act of 2018

While criminal justice reform has traditionally been prioritized by Democrats, Trump successfully signed the First Step Act into law with overwhelming bipartisan support. Staunch conservatives and reform advocates alike praised the bill for reducing mandatory minimum sentences for certain nonviolent federal offenses, expanding rehabilitation programs in prisons, and correcting sentencing disparities.

9. Defense of Second Amendment Rights

Gun rights advocates consistently backed Trump for his staunch defense of the Second Amendment. Beyond his fiery rhetoric against federal gun control, his judicial appointments ensured that courts remained deeply protective of firearm ownership rights, shielding them from federal restrictions.

10. Direct, Anti-Establishment Combative Style

Beyond specific policies, a major draw for staunch Republicans is Trump’s willingness to aggressively challenge the political establishment, federal bureaucracies ("the deep state"), and mainstream media narratives. His unfiltered, counter-punching style is viewed by his base as a fearless defense of working-class Americans against coastal elites and institutional norms.

Since returning to office, the second term has leaned heavily into sweeping executive actions designed to fulfill long-held conservative goals—particularly around dismantling the federal bureaucracy, accelerating border enforcement, and pushing back against institutional "woke" policies.

Several key actions and policy shifts from the second term (2025–2026) consistently win high praise from the Republican base:

11. Aggressive Dismantling of the "Administrative State"

A crown jewel for conservatives in the second term has been the direct assault on the federal civil service. Through executive orders targeting bureaucratic accountability (such as reclassifying certain policy-influencing roles into excepted service tracks like "Schedule Policy/Career"), the administration has moved swiftly to downsize federal agencies, curb regulatory overreach, and fire underperforming or entrenched bureaucrats.

12. Intensified Border Control and Immigration Restrictions

Building on his first-term agenda, Trump’s second term has implemented hardline immigration policies right out of the gate. Key actions include executive orders challenging near-universal birthright citizenship, expanding interior enforcement and deportation frameworks (like Project Homecoming), and enforcing rigorous vetting and entry restrictions.

13. Unleashing Energy Dominance and Grid Security

The administration immediately declared a national energy emergency upon taking office, establishing the National Energy Dominance Council to fast-track oil and gas leasing, roll back Biden-era climate restrictions, and boost domestic fuel production. Additionally, actions targeting the security of the U.S. bulk-power system have focused on protecting the national grid from foreign threats.

14. Sweeping Bans on Federal DEI and Institutional "Wokeness"

Staunch conservatives celebrate the administration's aggressive crackdown on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Trump signed sweeping executive orders terminating all "illegal DEI" programs across federal agencies and federal contractors, restricting gender-affirming care policies, and protecting single-sex spaces based strictly on biological sex.

15. The "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) Initiative

Rooted in an alliance with the broader populist-conservative health movement, the administration established the MAHA Commission to combat chronic illness, address ultra-processed foods and chemical additives, and re-evaluate federal public health and childhood vaccine guidelines to align closer with peer nations.

16. Restoration of Free Speech and Ending Federal Censorship

Conservatives strongly back executive actions aimed at ending federal "censorship-industrial complex" activities. These orders prohibit federal agencies from coordinating with social media platforms, universities, or private entities to suppress constitutionally protected speech or label dissenting viewpoints as misinformation.

17. Re-centering the Military on Merit and Readiness

In the defense sector, the administration moved quickly to reinstate service members discharged under military COVID-19 vaccine mandates, strip ideological equity frameworks from military recruitment and promotions, and prioritize combat readiness, lethality, and traditional military excellence.

18. Protectionist Trade Actions and De Minimis Overhauls

To protect domestic markets from foreign circumvention, the administration cracked down on international trade loopholes—most notably by suspending the duty-free de minimis treatment for imports from all countries to level the playing field for American retail and manufacturing industries.

19. Peace Through Strength

Trump is willing to use force to promote peace, but his primary weapon for that is negotiations, trade, and financial warfare. Making a deal that is mutually beneficial to all involved is far more preferable to dropping bombs. He has ended 8 wars during his presidency. 

20. The return of American Pride

I love that being proud to be an American is not a thing to be ashamed of in my own country. Democrats love to shame America and focus on the wrong things that America does and has done. Instead, let's focus on the GOOD that this country has done! Why must we CONSTANTLY focus on the negative? It is infuriating.

Bonus:

Trump has also exposed widespread fraud. More of this please!!!!

Are rising Gas prices Trump’s fault?

 

Stop Blaming Trump for Iran’s War on the Oil Supply

There is something intellectually dishonest about looking at Americans’ rising gasoline prices and simply declaring, “This is all Trump’s fault.”

Because it isn’t that simple.

The United States is engaged in a confrontation with the Islamic Republic of Iran, a regime that has spent decades sponsoring terrorism, threatening its neighbors, developing weapons, supporting militant proxies and defying international demands. The conflict did not begin with Donald Trump. It is the latest chapter in a confrontation that has been going on since the Iranian Revolution of 1979.

What President Trump has done is attempt to bring that long-running problem to a conclusion.

And Iran’s response has been entirely consistent with the behavior of the regime for decades: retaliation, threats, terrorism, proxy warfare and disruption of international commerce.

The Strait of Hormuz is now the most obvious example.

Iran knows that Hormuz is one of the world’s great energy chokepoints. Before the war, roughly a fifth of the world’s oil supply passed through the strait. When shipping is threatened, the consequences are felt around the globe.

And Iran has been willing to exploit that vulnerability.

The result is not theoretical. Reuters reports that shipping traffic through Hormuz has collapsed to a tiny fraction of its prewar level, with only seven vessel transits recorded on September 10. The reduction in shipping has coincided with a sharp rise in oil prices, with Brent crude moving above $100 a barrel. 

That is how Americans end up paying more at the pump.

So let’s follow the chain of causation.

Iran attacks shipping.

Iran threatens the Strait of Hormuz.

Oil shipments are disrupted.

Global oil supplies become less certain.

The price of crude rises.

Refined fuel becomes more expensive.

Americans pay more for gasoline and diesel.

That is the mechanism.

You can debate whether President Trump should have pursued military action. You can debate whether the United States should have negotiated longer. You can debate the wisdom of the blockade or any particular military operation. You can even question the timing (before the mid-terms).

Those are legitimate questions.

But they are different from claiming that Donald Trump personally caused the gasoline-price increase.

Iran is an active participant in the chain of events producing the energy problem.

Indeed, Reuters reported this week that Iran attacked ten vessels near the Strait of Hormuz after the United States destroyed five Iranian oil tankers. The resulting escalation drove Brent crude above $100 a barrel and sharply reduced oil flowing through the strait. 

That isn’t Donald Trump “causing gas prices.”

That is an international war disrupting a critical global energy corridor.

And there is a larger historical point that Americans ought to remember.

The Iranian regime has been behaving this way for nearly half a century.

Since 1979, the Islamic Republic has repeatedly demonstrated that when confronted with pressure, it does not necessarily respond by becoming a responsible member of the international community. It has used hostage-taking, terrorism, proxy militias, missile development, nuclear brinkmanship and threats against international shipping as instruments of state power.

The current crisis is therefore not some random event that appeared out of nowhere during Trump’s presidency.

It is the latest confrontation with a regime that has been a persistent source of instability since the Iranian Revolution.

The Trump administration has explicitly framed its campaign around dismantling Iran’s military capabilities, preventing it from obtaining nuclear weapons and cutting its ability to support terrorist proxies. 

Whatever one’s opinion of that strategy, it is important to understand what Iran is doing in response.

Iran is not simply sitting passively while America acts.

It is fighting back.

And one of the most effective weapons available to Tehran is economic disruption.

Iran cannot defeat the United States militarily in a conventional war. But it can threaten shipping. It can attack tankers. It can threaten energy infrastructure. It can create uncertainty in the oil market.

And uncertainty itself has a price.

That is why the simplistic political argument—“Gas prices are going up, therefore Trump is to blame”—doesn’t withstand serious examination.

It is equivalent to blaming a police officer for the damages to a car when a criminal crashes it while fleeing. The criminal crashed the car because the officer attempted to arrest the criminal. The officer may have made decisions that can be legitimately debated. But in the end the criminal is still responsible for crashing the car.

Likewise, Americans can debate President Trump’s decisions without pretending that Iran has no agency of its own.

Iran chose to attack shipping.

Iran chose to threaten international commerce.

Iran chose to use the Strait of Hormuz as leverage.

And Iran is continuing to escalate rather than simply accepting the consequences of its own behavior.

The White House has described the broader American strategy as an attempt to isolate the Iranian regime economically and prevent it from continuing to threaten international security. 

Whether that strategy ultimately succeeds is something history will judge.

But one thing should not be confused:

The fact that Americans are suffering economically from a war does not automatically mean that the American president caused the economic pain.

Sometimes a president inherits a problem that has been festering for decades.

Sometimes confronting that problem is expensive.

And sometimes the adversary deliberately makes the price even higher because it hopes Americans will become impatient and turn against their own government.

That may be precisely the calculation Tehran is making.

If Iran can turn an American family’s trip to the gas station into anger at the White House, then Tehran has discovered a remarkably cheap weapon: American political division. And of course they have an ally in the American Democratic party which takes every opportunity to foment hatred toward Trump.

Americans should be careful not to fall for this.

We can argue about Donald Trump.

We can criticize him when criticism is warranted.

We can debate his military decisions.

But we should also be capable of identifying the enemy’s actions without blaming our own country for them.

The Iranian regime has spent nearly fifty years demonstrating what happens when a government believes it can threaten the civilized world without consequences.

President Trump has chosen confrontation rather than endless accommodation.

Now Iran is fighting back.

And if Iran deliberately disrupts the world’s oil supply in an attempt to retaliate, the responsibility for that disruption belongs first and foremost to the government doing the disrupting—not to the Americans who are trying to stop it.

The answer to an aggressor creating chaos is not to pretend the aggressor isn’t responsible.

It is to understand what is actually happening.

Iran is creating the energy crisis. America is responding to it.

Those are not the same thing.

Democrats = Clueless Socially-Conscious Socialist Feelie-Monsters

 

Government is a difficult thing. You are in charge of (among other things):

• law enforcement
• economic opportunity
• infrastructure
• social welfare
• foreign relations
• and the general well-being.

Republicans are really good at this type of thing.

Democrats, not so much!

One huge problem with Dems is that they put WAY too much emphasis on social justice (social welfare). Inside that is activism, and equity and inclusion. Things like that.

When those things are your bread and butter, running a government is secondary to other feeling-oriented things like inclusion, diversity, and equity of outcome. But that is unrealistic and impossible to implement in the realm of government.

Equality and social welfare is a small (albeit important) part of governing a large group of people. More important is... can they be safe? Do they have opportunity? Are there jobs? Can we trust the roads and bridges? Are we free from government oppression? Are there green spaces and parks we can enjoy? Can we make a living?

The question of whether homosexuals feel special... is WAAAAY down the list of important things to worry about for a city, state, or country. Especially when homosexuals are already covered by the same rights we all enjoy. You have a right to be homosexual in this country if you are a law-abiding citizen. Same if you are black, a woman, or any other subdivided group. 

Republicans prioritize infrastructure, economy, and safety above those secondary (or tertiary) things. By doing this, the feelie-monsters imply that they "don't care", are "insensitive", or worst of all "intolerant", simply because they prioritize the welfare of the entire populace and not just subdivided groups that some considered marginalized or undervalued.

Democrats are the party of feelings and emotion. Republicans are the party of logic, law, and order.

Democrats are the hedonistic teenage college brats trying to take the family sedan for a joyride with their hippy friends. Republicans are their parents who tell them "No."

One barometer to look at to gauge whether a city government is functioning properly, is HOMELESSNESS. Homelessness in a city will tell you whether the government is functioning properly or not. For instance I live in San Antonio and we have a bad homelessness problem. Not coincidentally we are a VERY blue city. Been democrat for many many years.

In Texas alone the cities with the highest homelessness are:

Dallas: 3,718
San Antonio: 3,398
Houston: 3,280
Austin: 2,975
Fort Worth: 2,463

I'll let you guess which ideology runs all of these cities. Yep, every one of them are Liberal Democrat run cities. Note: Fort worth has a Republican mayor, but the council and electorate are mostly Democrat. The Republican mayor (Mattie Parker) is reportedly a RINO. Haha!

Let me also say this is not strictly a party thing. It is primarily a left or right thing. There are some Democrats who are conservative. There are some Republicans who are more "progressive". I'm of course making a generalized statement. Most conservatives are Republican, and most "progressives" are Democratic. 

With that out of the way let me say that when your top priority as a mayor is painting "Gay Pride" rainbow crosswalks instead of making sure the streets are cleaned of trash, that's a huge problem. If your top priority is making sure "people of color" are "empowered" instead of making sure crime isn't running rampant in your streets, you have a major problem. If your top priority is "righting history's wrongs" instead of creating jobs, you have a massive problem.

If you want to work at social betterment, that's great. But politics isn't the place for that. Politics should be strictly for those people who want to make a good safe functioning community for all their constituents. Not social justice activists.

In my opinion, Obama was the first social justice activist president (he was a "community organizer", which another term for a radical rabble-rouser.). He set a terrible precedent. Obama made "righting history's wrongs" the center of his presidency. Why not put American values first? Isn't that what an American president should do?

I mean, the coach for the Dallas Cowboys would be a pretty crappy Dallas Cowboys coach if he prioritized the Philadelphia Eagles over his own team. Can you even imagine that? No, that Cowboys coach bleeds silver and blue! He's all about the Cowboys. So an American president should be that way too. He should honestly believe that America is the best place on Earth, bar none.

The Democrats say: "Diversity is our strength."

The Republicans, on the other hand, say: "Unity is our strength."

Which view is right? 

I believe that UNITY is our STRENGTH!! Last time I checked we are called the UNITED States of America. Not the DIVERSE States of America. Yes, we are diverse. But we stand united by certain core ideals. Here are the common ideals ALL Americans share!

We want to live free. We want to be treated fairly under the law. We want to have a voice in our government. We want opportunities for ourselves and our children. We want justice if we are wronged. We want law and order. We want to live in dignity. We want the freedom to pursue happiness according to our deepest convictions. We understand that our rights end where another person's rights begin.

These things are universal to every single one of us. Black, white, Asian, middle eastern, Christian, Muslim, Jew, rich, poor, homosexual, heterosexual... everyone!

Unfortunately, Democrats love to divide people. Blacks vs. whites, Gays vs. straights, rich vs. poor. Citizens vs. Immigrants. Left vs. Right. Always dividing. They also LOVE to blame people. The blame game is their favorite sport. If someone is down, then according to a Democrat, it isn't the person's fault, or misfortune, no! It's white people's fault. It's rich people's fault. When you encourage this mess, both sides become resentful and hatred grows on both sides. This must not be allowed to happen.

Another important distinction is this. Republicans want to convince their political opponent to change their minds and become new Republicans. Democrats, on the other hand, don't care about convincing anyone about anything, they want to crush, and destroy their political opponents. Look at Charlie Kirk and Donald Trump for instance one got murdered for his opinions, and the other has been shot at multiple times. To the left, actually killing their political opponent is a viable, and on social media, highly encouraged, option. How tragically sad.

Let's leave the Democrat party behind. Just like we dissolved the Whig party, the Federalist party, the Bull-Moose Party, and the Reform Party. Let's leave it behind where it belongs. On the dung-heap of history.

Thanks Dems! [LOL!]

 

So during this election year, there are these yard signs popping up here in San Antonio that say "Thanks Dems!" Haha! Actually!

So what can we thank Dems for? Let's go!

The Bottom 5 Cities in the USA.

Detroit, MI - DEMOCRATIC city government

Poverty & Economic Hardship. Lowest median family income in major U.S. cities.

Memphis, TN - DEMOCRATIC city government

Safety & Violent Crime Risks. Highest violent crime risk in key family livability data.

Flint, MI - DEMOCRATIC city government

Public Health & Infrastructure. Ranks near the bottom for physical and long-term sleep wellness.

St. Louis, MO - DEMOCRATIC city government

Population Loss & Disinvestment Close to 30% of the core city population lives in poverty.

Cleveland, OH - DEMOCRATIC city government

Crime Rates & Economic Health. High crime risk accompanied by low general health scores.

THANKS DEMS!!!!

Now let's look at the flipside...

Top 5 most LIVABLE places in the USA

Huntsville AL - REPUBLICAN 

Carmel IN - REPUBLICAN

Sugarland TX - REPUBLICAN leaning independent

Naperville IL - REPUBLICAN

Plano TX - REPUBLICAN leaning independent

Also while we're at it... Democrats brought us:

Slavery

Jim Crow Laws

Segregation

Lynching

Internment camps

The Civil War

The KKK

and two world wars.

Thanks DEMS! HAHA!